November 6, 2007
Posted by PL | Filed Under Political Lunch
135Commentshttp://www.politicallunch.com/2007/11/06/political-lunch-11-06-07-tuesday-snack/Political+Lunch+11-06-07%3A+Tuesday+Snack2007-11-06+21%3A51%3A03PL to “Political Lunch 11-06-07: Tuesday Snack”
Hi, Love the podcast. Keep up the good work. After watching the most recent podcast about the candidate match page I felt I had to write to tell you about http://www.issuedictionary.com . This web site lets you pick the issues that are important to you and not just the issues they decided to list and it shows the actual statements about the issue from the candidates instead of words a web site chooses that could bias an issue. As an exaqmple, I dont care at all about gay marraige one way or another but gun control weighs uppermost in my concerns (I own a gun store). With one question Kucinich is out of the running for me. Hope it helps. Thanks for the podcast. Linda
Awesome edition today!
BTW, thanks for the hat and the mug. First time I ever won anything real on the Internet :-)
JFCooper (aka Daniel Nestlerode)
You’re results aren’t particularly surprising.
Both parties are broad churches and the majority of people are unlikely to agree with everything one of the parties says.
Look at Ron Paul, he advocates Republican economic policy and Democrat social policy.
This just goes to show that the majority of the public are happy to go along with whoever the media belive are the frontrunners and whoever gets all the airtime in the media.
I just wish more people would spend some time thinking about what they believe in and finding out which candidates agree with them instead of voting for the guy with the most speaking time at the debates or the best hair.
Got something to say?
Name (required)
Email Address(required)
Website
Speak your mind
